@book{hertel1997,
title = {The standard GTAP framework is documented in Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications},
editor = {Thomas Hertel},
year = 1997,
publisher = {Cambridge University Press}
}

@article{humphrey1975,
 ISSN = {00384038},
 URL = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/1056165},
 author = {David Burras Humphrey},
 journal = {Southern Economic Journal},
 number = {3},
 pages = {531--534},
 publisher = {Southern Economic Association},
 title = {Estimates of Factor-Intermediate Substitution and Separability},
 urldate = {2023-02-06},
 volume = {41},
 year = {1975}
}
@TechReport{peter2019,
  author={Alessandra Peter and Cian Ruane},
  title={{The Aggregate Importance of Intermediate Input Substitutability}},
  year=2019,
  month=,
  institution={UniCredit Foundation, Working Paper No. 125}
}

@article{taheripour2020, title={Land Use in Computable General Equilibrium Models}, volume={5}, url={https://jgea.org/ojs/index.php/jgea/article/view/79}, DOI={10.21642/JGEA.050202AF}, abstractNote={&amp;lt;p style=&amp;quot;margin: 0in 0.2in 12pt 0in;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Constant Elasticity of Transformation (CET) functions are widely used to allocate land across uses in Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) models. These models fail to maintain the physical area of land in balance. This paper examines this issue. It shows that heterogeneity in land prices (rents) is the main source of imbalance in land area, not the curvature of the CET function. It also shows that the available approaches that restore balance to physical area either introduce ad hoc adjustments in land allocation or undermine the conventional welfare assessments of the CET results. An alternative approach involves implementing stochastic productivity distribution functions (e.g. Fréchet distribution) to allocate land among uses maintain area of land in balance, thereby respecting conventional welfare assessments. A particular feature of these models is that the aggregate production functions of the land using sectors exhibit decreasing returns to scale even if land is the only factor of production. This approach also requires equalization of land rents across uses. This is not consistent with empirical observation. Both the CET and stochastic methods consider the implicit opportunity costs of moving land across uses but fail to take into account preparation costs associated with land use conversion.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;}, number={2}, journal={Journal of Global Economic Analysis}, author={Taheripour, Farzad and Zhao, Xin and Horridge, Mark and Farrokhi, Farid and Tyner, Wallace}, year={2020}, month={Dec.}, pages={63–109} }

author={Taheripour2017,
Taheripour, Farzad and Zhao, Xin andTyner, Wallace E.},
year = {2017},
title = {{The impact of considering land intensification and updated data on biofuels land use change and emissions estimates}},
journal = {{Biotechnology for Biofuels}},
volume = 10,
issue = 1,
abstract={{The GTAP model has been used to estimate biofuel policy induced land use changes and consequent GHG emissions for more than a decade. This paper reviews the history of the model and database modifications and improvements that have occurred over that period. In particular, the paper covers in greater detail the move from the 2004 to the 2011 database, and the inclusion of cropland intensification in the modeling structure.}}
}

@article{taheripour2010,
title = {Biofuels and their by-products: Global economic and environmental implications},
journal = {Biomass and Bioenergy},
volume = {34},
number = {3},
pages = {278-289},
year = {2010},
issn = {0961-9534},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.10.017},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953409002207},
author = {Farzad Taheripour and Thomas W. Hertel and Wallace E. Tyner and Jayson F. Beckman and Dileep K. Birur},
keywords = {General equilibrium, Biofuel, Mandates, Land use changes, DDGS},
abstract = {Recently a number of papers have used general equilibrium models to study the economy-wide and environmental consequences of the first generation of biofuels (FGB). In this paper, we argue that nearly all of these studies have overstated the impacts of FGB on global agricultural and land markets due to the fact that they have ignored the role of biofuel by-products. Feed by-products of FGB, such as dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS) and oilseed meals (VOBP), are used in the livestock industry as protein and energy sources. Their presence mitigates the price impacts of biofuel production. More importantly, they reduce the demand for cropland and moderate the indirect land use consequences of FGB. This paper explicitly introduces DDGS and VOBP into a global computational general equilibrium (CGE) model, developed at the Center for Global Trade Analysis at Purdue University, to examine the economic and environmental impacts of regional and international mandate policies designed to stimulate bioenergy production and use. We show that models with and without by-products reveal different portraits of the economic impacts of the US and EU biofuel mandates for the world economy in 2015. While both models demonstrate significant changes in the agricultural production pattern across the world, the model with by-products shows smaller changes in the production of cereal grains and larger changes for oilseeds products in the US and EU, and the reverse for Brazil. Models that omit by-products are found to overstate cropland conversion from US and EU mandates by about 27%.}
}

@article{hertel2019,
author = {Thomas Hertel   and Dominique {van der Mensbrugghe}},
year = {2019},
title = {{Chapter 14: Behavioral Parameters in The GTAP Data Base: Version 10}}
}

@article{beckman2020,
author = {Beckman, Jayson and Maros Ivanic and Jeremy Jelliffe and Felix Baquedano and Sara Scott},
year = {2020},
title = {{ Economic and Food Security Impacts of Agricultural Input Reduction Under the European Union Green Deal’s Farm to Fork and Biodiversity Strategies}},
journal = {{Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture}},
volume = {{Economic Brief 30}}
}

@article{beckman2022,
author = {Beckman, Jayson and Maros Ivanic and Jeremy Jelliffe},
year = {{2022}},
title = {{Market Impacts of Farm to Fork: Reducing Agricultural Input Usage}},
journal = {{Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy}},
volume = {{44}},
issue = {{4}},
page = {{1995--2013}}
}

@article{beckman2022b,
author = {Beckman, Jayson and Ivanic, Maros and Jelliffe, Jeremy and Arita, Shawn},
title = {Adopt or not adopt? Mirror clauses and the European Green Deal},
journal = {Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy},
volume = {44},
number = {4},
pages = {2014-2033},
keywords = {CGE, EU, fertilizer, pesticides, standards},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13317},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/aepp.13317},
eprint = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/aepp.13317},
abstract = {Abstract Mirror clauses have recently been discussed as a way of setting a level playing field for EU farmers in terms of the proposed European Green Deal (EGD) and the proposed reduction in usage of agricultural inputs. This study builds a Nash equilibrium model to determine if regions would implement these reductions to maintain open trade with the European Union. We find that more regions joining the EGD dampen the negative market impacts to the European Union, but we also find that major agricultural producers do not join the European Union in implementing the EGD.},
year = {2022}
}

@article{burfisher2014,
author = {Burfisher, Mary and John Dyck and Birgit Meade and Lorraine Mitchell and John Wainio and Steven Zahniser and Shawn Arita and Jayson Beckman},
year = 2014,
title = {{Agriculture in the Trans-pacific Partnership}},
volume = {{ERR 176}},
journal = {{Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture}}
}
}


@article{beckman2015,
author = {Beckman, Jayson and Shawn Arita and Lorraine Mitchell and Mary Burfisher},
year = 2015,
title = {{Agriculture in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: Tariffs, Tariff-Rate Quotas, and Non-Tariff Measures}},
voluem = {{ERR 198}},
journal = {{Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture}}
}

@article{beckman2011,
author = {Beckman, Jayson and Thomas Hertel and Wallace Tyner},
year = 2011,
title ={{Validating Energy-oriented CGE Models}},
journal = {{Energy Economics}},
volume = {33},
issue = {5},
page ={{799-806}}
}

@article{hertel2007,
author = {Thomas Hertel and David Hummels and Maros Ivanic and Roman Keeney},
year = 2007,
title ={{How Confident Can We Be of CGE-based Assessments of Free Trade Agreements?}},
journal = {{Economic Modelling}},
volume = 24,
issue = 4,
page = {{611-635}}
}

@article{bajzik2020,
author = {Josef Bajzik  and Tomas Havranek and Zuzana Irsova and Jiri Schwarz},
year = 2020,
title = {{Estimating the Armington Elasticity: The Importance of Study Design and Publication Bias}},
journal = {{Journal of International Economics}},
voume = 127
}


@article{reimer2004,
author = {Reimer, Jeffrey and Thomas Hertel},
year = 2004,
title = {{International Cross Section Estimates of Demand for Use in the GTAP Model}},
journal = {{GTAP Technical paper}},
volume = 23,
publisher = {{Center for Global Trade Analysis, West Lafayette, Indiana}}
}

}


@article{jomini1991,
author ={Jomini, Patrick and John Zeitsch and Robert McDougall and Andrew Welsh and Stephen Brown and John Hambley and John Kelly},
year = 1991,
title = {{SALTER: A General Equilibrium Model of the World Economy, Vol. 1. Model Structure, Data Base, and Parameters}},
journal = {{Canberra, Australia: Industry Commission}}
}

@article{lofgren1994,
author = {Lofgren, Hans},
year = 1994,
title = {{A Brief Survey of Elasticities for CGE Models}},
journal = {{Technical Report for the Ford Foundation}}
}


@article{hertel2010,

author = {Hertel, Thomas and Alla Golub and Andrew Jones and Michael O’Hare and Richard Plevin and Daniel Kammen},
year = 2010,
title = {{Effects of US Maize Ethanol on Global Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Estimating Market-mediated Responses}},
journal = {{Bioscience}},
volume = 60,
issue = 3,
page ={{223-231}}
}
}

@article{wing2004,
author = {Wing, Ian},
year = 2004,
title = {{Computable General Equilibrium Models and Their Use in Economy-Wide Policy Analysis: Everything You Ever Wanted to Know (But Were Afraid to Ask)}},
journal = {{MIT Working Paper}}
}


@article{koesler2015,
author = {Koesler, Simon},
year = 2015,
title = {{Specifying Parameters in Computable General Equilibrium Models using Optimal Fingerprint Detection Methods}},
journal = {{MIT Report No. 276}}
}

@article{lee2005,
author={Lee, Huey-Lin},
year = 2005,
title = {{Incorporating Agro-Ecologically Zoned Land Use Data and Land-based Greenhouse Gases Emissions into the GTAP Framework}},
journal = {{Paper presented at the 8th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Lübeck, German}}
}


@article{oberfield2014,
author = {Oberfield, Ezra and Devesh Raval},
title = {{Micro Data and Macro Technology}},
journal = {Princeton},
year = 2014,
}

@article{taheripour2020,
author = {Taheripour, Farzad and Xin Zhao and Mark Horridge and Farid Farrokhi and Wallace Tyner},
year = 2020,
title = {{Land use in Computable General Equilibrium Models}},
journal = {{Journal of Global Economic Analysis}},
volume = 5,
issue = 2,
page = {63-109}
}


@article{bartelings2016,
author = {Bartelings, Heleen and Aikaterini Kavallari and Hans van Meijl and Martin Von Lampe},
year = 2016,
title = {{Estimating the impact of fertilizer support policies: A CGE approach}},
journal = {{Paper prepared for the 16th annual conference on global economic analysis, Washington, DC, USA. 2016}}
}

@article{aguiar2016,
author = {Aguiar, Angel and Badri Narayanan and Robert McDougall},
title = {{An Overview of the GTAP 9 Data Base}},
journal = {{Journal of Global Economic Analysis}},
volume = 1,
issue = 1,
year = 2016,
page = {181-208}

}

@article{
aguiar2019,
author = {Angel Aguiar and Maksym  Chepeliev and Erewin Corong and Robert McDougall and Dominique van der Mensbrugghe},
year = 2019,
title = {{The GTAP Data Base: Version 10}},
journal = {{Journal of Global Economic Analysis}},
volume = 4,
issue = 1,
page = {{1-27}}
}

@article{richardson27,
author = {Richardson, Lewis Fry and Gaunt, J. Arthur},
year = 1927,
title = {{The deferred approach to the limit}},
journal ={{Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character}}
}

@article{aguiar2022, title={The Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) Data Base: Version 11}, volume={7}, url={https://jgea.org/ojs/index.php/jgea/article/view/181}, abstractNote={&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;This paper describes the construction of the GTAP Data Base, version 11. The database reconciles different data sources at a global scale for analytical use and provides time series data on value flows, volumes, and various tax instruments. GTAP version 11 has 5 reference years (2004, 2007, 2011, 2014, and 2017), distinguishes 65 sectors in each of 141 countries and 19 aggregate regions - with individual countries accounting for 99.1% of world GDP and 96.4% of world population. The exhaustive nature of GTAP in its country and sector coverage facilitates its use in economy-wide studies of global economic issues.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;}, number={2}, journal={Journal of Global Economic Analysis}, author={Aguiar, Angel and Chepeliev, Maksym and Corong, Erwin and van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique}, year={2022}, month={Dec.} }


@techreport{hertel2008,
 title={Modeling Land-use Related Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks and their Mitigation Potential},
 author={Thomas Hertel and Huey-Lin Lee and Steven Rose and Brent Sohngen},
 institution={Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP)},
 year={2008},
 address={Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN},
 number={44},
 type={GTAP Working Paper},
 url={https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/res_display.asp?RecordID=2605},
 abstract={*Chapter 6 of the forthcoming book "Economic Analysis of Land Use in Global Climate Change Policy," edited by Thomas W. Hertel, Steven Rose, and Richard S.J. Tol}
}

@article{fujiy2022,
title = {Production Networks and Firm-level Elasticities of Substitution},
author = {Brian Cevallos Fujiy and  Devaki Ghose and Gaurav Khanna},
year = 2022,
journal = {STEG Working Paper Series}
}



@techreport{keeney2005,
 title={GTAP-AGR: A Framework for Assessing the Implications of Multilateral Changes in Agricultural Policies},
 author={Roman Keeney and Thomas Hertel},
 institution={Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP)},
 year={2005},
 address={Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN},
 number={24},
 type={GTAP Technical Paper},
 url={https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/res_display.asp?RecordID=1869},
 abstract={Global models of agricultural trade have a long and distinguished history. The introduction of the GTAP data base and modeling project represented a significant advance forward as it put modelers and trade policy analysts on common ground. After an initial generation of GTAP based modeling of agricultural trade policy using the standard modeling framework, individual researchers have begun introducing agricultural specificity into the standard modeling framework in order to better capture the particular features of the agricultural economy pertinent to their research questions. This technical paper follows in that same tradition by reviewing important linkages between international trade and the farm and food economy and introducing them into the standard GTAP modeling framework, offering a special purpose version of the model nicknamed GTAP-AGR. We introduce this agricultural specificity by introducing new behavioral relationships into the standard GTAP framework. We focus particular attention on the factor markets, which play a critical role in determining the incidence of producer subsidies. This includes modifying both the factor supply and derived demand equations. We also modify the specification of consumer demand, assuming separability of food from non-food commodities. Finally, we introduce the important substitution possibilities amongst feedstuffs used in the livestock sector. Where possible we support these new behavioral relationships with literature-based estimates of both the mean and standard deviation of behavioral parameters. The express purpose of this is to support systematic sensitivity analysis with respect to policy reform scenarios performed with GTAP-AGR. In addition to documenting these extensions to the standard modeling framework, the paper has an additional goal, and that is to gauge the performance of the GTAP-AGR model and how it differs from the standard GTAP framework. We do this primarily by comparing the farm level supply and demand response in terms of policy incidence for the two frameworks. In addition, we evaluate the ability of both models to reproduce observed price volatility in an effort to validate the performance of these models. Finally, we evaluate the results of the two models in a side-by-side comparison of results from full liberalization of agricultural and non-agricultural support.}
}

@article{nava2023,
title={A model of the US food system: What are the determinants of the state vulnerabilities to production shocks and supply chain disruptions?},
author={Nava, No{\'e} J and Ridley, William and Dall'erba, Sandy},
journal={Agricultural Economics}, volume={54},
number={1},
pages={95--109},
year={2023}, publisher={Wiley Online Library} }

@article{
beckman2023,
title={Estimating Market Implications From Corn and Soybean Yields Under Climate Change in the United States},
author={Beckman, Jayson and Ivanic, Maros and Nava, No{\'e} J},
journal={Economic Research Service, forthcoming},
year={2023}
}
@techreport{baldos2020,
 title={Development of GTAP 10 Land Use and Land Cover Data Base for years 2004, 2007, 2011 and 2014},
 author={Uris Lantz Baldos and Erwin Corong},
 institution={Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP)},
 year={2020},
 address={Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN},
 number={36},
 type={GTAP Research Memorandum},
 url={https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/res_display.asp?RecordID=6187},
 abstract={Understanding the challenges of achieving environmental sustainability goals given future demand for food, fiber and fuel requires economic frameworks that incorporate spatially explicit information on land use and land cover (LULC). The GTAP LULC Data Base and its variants have been extensively used in a wide variety of applications aimed at examining the land-environment-energy nexus (Golub et al., 2012; Hertel et al., 2010; Johnson et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2014; Peña-Lévano et al., 2019; Stevenson et al., 2013; Taheripour et al., 2010; Taheripour & Tyner, 2012).
The first release of the GTAP LULC Data Base combines geospatial data on land use and land cover into GTAP 6 Data Base – benchmarked to year 2001 (GTAP LULC v6). The methodology for creating and using this database is well documented (Lee et al., 2009; C. Monfreda et al., 2009; Sohngen et al., 2008). Succeeding updates of the GTAP LULC Data Base (namely v7 and v8 for 2004 and v8 for 2004, 2007) relied on readily available but aggregated GTAP LULC v6, albeit using national-level data from FAOSTAT (2020) (Avetisyan et al., 2010; Baldos & Hertel, 2012). Starting with GTAP 9, LULC was created directly from the latest, high-resolution (i.e. 5-minute) spatial land cover and land use maps in combination with national-level statistics (Baldos, 2017). This memorandum documents the development of the GTAP LULC version10A which is based on the GTAP v10A Data Base for years 2004, 2007, 2011 and 2014 (Aguiar et al., 2019). This update heavily relies on the methodology for creating GTAP LULC v9 which downscales national-level land cover and crop production statistics from FAOSTAT (2020) using publicly available spatial data (see Appendix I).
}
}

@Inbook{martin2016,
author="Martin, Will
and Ivanic, Maros",
editor="Kalkuhl, Matthias
and von Braun, Joachim
and Torero, Maximo",
title="Food Price Changes, Price Insulation, and Their Impacts on Global and Domestic Poverty",
bookTitle="Food Price Volatility and Its Implications for Food Security and Policy",
year="2016",
publisher="Springer International Publishing",
address="Cham",
pages="101--113",
abstract="Food price volatility---and in particular price spikes---can create serious problems for vulnerable individuals and groups. One quick, simple approach for governments to deal with this problem is to insulate their domestic market from changes in world prices. It turns out that many governments do this to a large degree, resulting in their domestic prices becoming much less volatile than world market prices. But if changes in international prices are sustained for a few years, policymakers appear to pass through most of these changes. Such sustained increases in food prices appear to be helpful in reducing poverty and to have had favorable impacts on global poverty since 2006. To individual policymakers, this approach of using short-term insulation and long-term pass-through seems to be very practical and useful, even though they know that insulation measures, like export restrictions and import tariff reductions, are beggar-thy-neighbor policies. Collectively, however, this policy approach appeared to be ineffective in reducing poverty during the 2006--2008 price spikes because price insulation contributed substantially to increasing food price volatility.",
isbn="978-3-319-28201-5",
doi="10.1007/978-3-319-28201-5_5",
url="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28201-5_5"
}

@article{martin2012,
 ISSN = {00029092, 14678276},
 URL = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/41331269},
 author = {Will Martin and Kym Anderson},
 journal = {American Journal of Agricultural Economics},
 number = {2},
 pages = {422--427},
 publisher = {[Agricultural & Applied Economics Association, Oxford University Press]},
 title = {Export Restrictions and Price Insulation During Commodity Price Booms},
 urldate = {2023-05-31},
 volume = {94},
 year = {2012}
}

@article{ivanic2023,

author = {Maros Ivanic and Jayson Beckman and Noe Nava},
title = {{Estimation of the value-added/intermediate input substitution elasticities consistent with the GTAP data}},
journal = {{Journal of Global Economic Analysis}},
year = 2023,
volume = {forthcoming}
}

}
@incollection{kahn1993,
  title={Recent experiences with surges in capital inflows},
  author={Kahn, Robert Brandon and Bennett, Adam and Schadler, Susan M and others},
  booktitle={Recent Experiences with Surges in Capital Inflows},
  year={1993},
  publisher={International Monetary Fund}
}

@incollection{randsbarros2016,
title = {Chapter 6 - Migration Profile and Human Capital Building in Brazil and the United States in the 19th Century},
editor = {Alexandre {Rands Barros}},
booktitle = {Roots of Brazilian Relative Economic Backwardness},
publisher = {Academic Press},
pages = {85-109},
year = {2016},
isbn = {978-0-12-809756-4},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809756-4.00006-4},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128097564000064},
author = {Alexandre {Rands Barros}},
keywords = {European mass migration, Human capital migration, Inequality decomposition, Intergenerational transmission of human capital, Surrogated per capita income},
abstract = {This chapter stresses that the role a country played in European mass migration in the 19th century was important in shaping the relative development reached by Brazil and other ex-European colonies, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. Simulations comparing the role of European migration in the relative development of Brazil and the United States indicate that under conservative assumptions this migration could account for between 80.6% and 115.4% of total disparities found in 1900 between these two countries. They also indicate that imported human capital accounted for between 64.1% and 95.7% of total growth in the proportion of US per capita GDP (gross domestic product) compared to Brazilian GDP.}
}

@article{lichter2015,
title = {The own-wage elasticity of labor demand: A meta-regression analysis},
journal = {European Economic Review},
volume = {80},
pages = {94-119},
year = {2015},
issn = {0014-2921},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.08.007},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292115001233},
author = {Andreas Lichter and Andreas Peichl and Sebastian Siegloch},
keywords = {Labor demand, Wage elasticity, Meta-analysis},
abstract = {The own-wage elasticity of labor demand is a key parameter in empirical research and policy analysis. However, despite extensive research, estimates of labor demand elasticities are subject to considerable heterogeneity. In this paper, we explore various dimensions of this heterogeneity by means of a comprehensive meta-regression analysis, building on information from 151 different studies containing 1334 estimates in total. Our results show that heterogeneity in the estimates of the elasticity is natural to a considerable extent: the magnitude of the elasticity depends on the theoretical model applied and features of the workforce. Moreover, we find that labor demand has become more elastic over time, and is particularly elastic in countries with low levels of employment protection legislation. Furthermore, we find heterogeneity due to the empirical specification of the labor demand model, characteristics of the dataset and publication bias.}
}

@incollection{boeters2013,
title = {Chapter 26 - The Labor Market in Computable General Equilibrium Models},
editor = {Peter B. Dixon and Dale W. Jorgenson},
series = {Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling},
publisher = {Elsevier},
volume = {1},
pages = {1645-1718},
year = {2013},
booktitle = {Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling SET, Vols. 1A and 1B},
issn = {2211-6885},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59568-3.00026-2},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780444595683000262},
author = {Stefan Boeters and Luc Savard},
keywords = {Computable general equilibrium model, labor market, labor supply, labor demand, microsimulation, involuntary unemployment},
abstract = {This chapter reviews options of labor market modeling in a computable general equilibrium framework. On the labor supply side, two principal modeling options are distinguished and discussed: aggregated, representative households and microsimulation based on individual household data. On the labor demand side, we focus on the substitution possibilities between different types of labor in production. With respect to labor market coordination, we discuss several wage-forming mechanisms and involuntary unemployment.}
}

@techreport{cantelmo2017,
  title={Sectoral Labor Mobility and Optimal Monetary Policy},
  author={Cantelmo, Alessandro and Melina, Giovanni},
  year={2017},
  institution={International Monetary Fund}
}

@techreport{woltjer2014,
  title={The MAGNET model: Module description},
  author={Woltjer, Gerard Bastiaan and Kuiper, Marijke and Kavallari, Aikaterini and van Meijl, Hans and Powell, JP and Rutten, MM and Shutes, LJ and Tabeau, AA},
  year={2014},
  institution={LEI Wageningen UR}
}

@article{tabeau2010,
  title={Modeling the agricultural employment development within the CGE framework: the consequences for policy responses},
  author={Tabeau, Andrzej and Woltjer, Geert},
  year={2010}
}

@techreport{oecd2020,
author = {{OECD}},
institution = {{Working Party of the Trade Committee}},
title = {{METRO Version 3 Model Documentation}},
year = 2020
}

@article{valenzuela2007,
  title={Assessing global computable general equilibrium model validity using agricultural price volatility},
  author={Valenzuela, Ernesto and Hertel, Thomas W and Keeney, Roman and Reimer, Jeffrey J},
  journal={American Journal of Agricultural Economics},
  volume={89},
  number={2},
  pages={383--397},
  year={2007},
  publisher={Wiley Online Library}
}

@article{beckman2011,
  title={Validating energy-oriented CGE models},
  author={Beckman, Jayson and Hertel, Thomas and Tyner, Wallace},
  journal={Energy Economics},
  volume={33},
  number={5},
  pages={799--806},
  year={2011},
  publisher={Elsevier}
}

@article{baquedano2022,
  title={Food security implications for low-and middle-income countries under agricultural input reduction: The case of the European Union's farm to fork and biodiversity strategies},
  author={Baquedano, Felix and Jelliffe, Jeremy and Beckman, Jayson and Ivanic, Maros and Zereyesus, Yacob and Johnson, Michael},
  journal={Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy},
  volume={44},
  number={4},
  pages={1942--1954},
  year={2022},
  publisher={Wiley Online Library}
}
